How High Sensitivity Testing Has Revolutionized Cardiac Care

Each year, millions of patients visit the Emergency Department with chest pain. Incorporating high-sensitivity troponin testing is essential for detecting cardiac damage.
How High Sensitivity Testing Has Revolutionized Cardiac Care

More than 620 million people are currently living with cardiovascular disease (CVD), and that number is on the rise;1,2 between 1990 and 2022, deaths from CVD increased from 12.4 million to almost 20 million.3 Each year, millions of patients present to Emergency Departments (EDs) with chest pain.4 Differentiating chest pain due to cardiac ischemia from benign conditions is challenging.5 Suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a leading cause of trips to the ED, and cardiovascular diseases remain a primary cause of death.6 For a condition where minutes matter, identifying a rapid, reliable biomarker to accurately identify AMI is necessary to reduce mortality and improve patient outcomes.7–9

The road to a high-sensitivity cardiac biomarker

In the 1970s and 1980s, CK-MB, creatine kinase-myocardial band, became the standard for identifying AMI. Creatine kinase (CK) is an enzyme present in all muscle cells, but the MB (myoglobin-binding) isoenzyme primarily occurs in cardiac muscle cells.10 When the heart is damaged, for example, during a heart attack, CK-MB leaks into the blood, where levels quickly climb. CK-MB levels peak about 12 hours after a heart attack. Prior to identification and implementation of CK-MB testing, patients with cardiac symptoms were observed for up to 3 days in the coronary care unit to determine whether they had a heart attack. With CK-MB, that time was reduced from days to hours.11
As useful and revolutionary as CK-MB measurements were in AMI, they were not terribly sensitive or specific. CK-MB does rise during a heart attack, but levels can also rise with skeletal muscle diseases, which decreases its usefulness. A new cardiac biomarker was needed.

What is cardiac troponin?

Troponin, another protein found in cardiac muscle, serves as a marker for cardiac damage. Troponin is a complex of three regulatory proteins (troponin C, troponin I, and troponin T) integral to contraction of skeletal and cardiac muscle. In the 1990s, cardiac troponin I (cTnI) was identified as a valuable biomarker for cardiac ischemia. Replacing CK-MB with troponin for MI detection has increased the ability to detect myocardial damage from heart attack up to 130%12—troponin assays, especially the newer, high sensitivity troponin assays, are not only more sensitive but also more specific than CK-MB assays.12

In a healthy person, circulating levels of cardiac troponin are extremely low, but like CK-MB, during myocardial infarction, troponin is released from the damaged myocardium.13 Troponin levels peak around 24 hours after a heart attack. With the older, low sensitivity troponin testing, a repeat test was needed 6-9 hours after presentation,5 but in 2010, high sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays became available globally, shortening the detection window to 2-3 hours. In 2017, these tests were introduced in the US.14 High sensitivity troponin testing, now the test of choice (Figure 1), enables a quick decision-making pathway for management of chest pain in the ED.14,15 The accuracy and precision of hs-cTn allows for detection of cardiac damage earlier—when the patient’s troponin levels are just beginning to rise following a heart attack.15

The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) issued guidance on hs-cTn assays. To be classified as a high sensitivity assay, the assay must:

  • have analytical imprecision ≤ 10% CV at the 99th percentile URL of a healthy population
  • be able to measure cTn above the Limit of Detection (LOD) in ≥ 50% of a healthy population16
HsTni-Sensitivity-Troponin testing method 

Figure 1. Troponin testing method in the main laboratory by geographic region. From Collinson et al. 202415

These rapid algorithms require high sensitivity troponin assays with excellent accuracy and precision at the lower end of detection—when the patient's troponin levels just start to rise after a cardiac event occurs. Today, hs-cTn is the biomarker of choice for chest pain management used in Emergency Departments around the world.15

Troponin and Sex

Understanding the impact of sexon the presentation and interpretation of hs-cTn results is essential for providing personalized and effective care. Females make up more than half of those with CVD,1,17 but they often remain “understudied, underdiagnosed, and undertreated,”17 which may lead to missed diagnoses in typical cardiac workups.17

And while overall mortality from coronary artery disease is steadily decreasing, there has been an increase in younger patients (35-54 years old), especially among females with the most significant increase in black females.18

Symptoms of heart attack in females are still often considered “atypical”19–21 when in fact they are absolutely typical—for a female. As one group put it, in the realm of females and cardiovascular disease, “Atypical symptoms were also common findings.”20 Interestingly, females are significantly more likely to present later to the hospital (≥12 hours from symptom onset) and more likely to be suspected of a non-ischemia problem than their male counterparts.22

Females show lower troponin levels, largely because they tend to have smaller hearts23–25—using a universal troponin cutoff value may result in under diagnosis in females. Sex-specific troponin ranges are only possible due to the high sensitivity and specificity of cardiac troponin assays, which allow for detection of even slight changes and enable a better understanding of myocardial injury, especially in female patients.26 When sex-specific thresholds for hs-cTn were studied, the proportion of males and females showing myocardial injury was shown to be roughly equivalent.24

Using hs-cTn testing has reduced the time to rule in or rule out cardiac ischemia for all patients,5 while expanding initiatives to educate women, especially women of color, about heart disease may help raise awareness, increase heart-health literacy, and decrease the incidence of heart disease in this highly vulnerable group.15,27

In 2022, the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) program—recognizing the changes in precision and accuracy of clinical laboratory tests and availability of newer assays—added 29 new regulated analytes. Troponin testing is part of the class of 2024,*28,29 which requires more rigorous CLIA standards and demands greater precision and accuracy to improve safety for all patients.30

When Westgard QC independently verified the Access hs-cTnI assay on the DxI 9000 analyzer to test its accuracy and reliability, the results were outstanding.

"With troponin testing on the DxI 9000 analyzer, some of the results are so precise they're just stacking on top of each other like arrows that go through arrows that go through arrows that hit the bullseye."
Sten Westgard

Our Commitment to Diagnostic Testing

Beckman Coulter and its proven high-sensitivity immunoassay capabilities are empowering healthcare providers, research organizations, and laboratories to address emerging diagnostic challenges across diverse specialties, from neurology to infectious diseases. We are revolutionizing the next generation of specialized diagnostics through high-sensitivity immunoassays, driving innovation, advancing medical insights, and enhancing diagnostic availability and adaptability to better serve patients in a variety of disease states.

Learn how to bring high-sensitivity immunoassay testing solutions to your laboratory.

*These guidelines, set in 2022, will go into effect in July 11, 2024.

Here, sex is defined as the presence or absence of a Y chromosome.

References:

1. Health Intelligence Team. Global Heart & Circulatory Diseases Factsheet. British Heart Foundation; 2024.

2. WHO. Cardiovascular diseases. World Health Organization. 2024. Accessed February 9, 2023. https://www.who.int/health-topics/cardiovascular-diseases#tab=tab_1

3. Mensah GA, Fuster V, Roth GA. A Heart-Healthy and Stroke-Free World: Using Data to Inform Global Action. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;82(25):2343-2349. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.11.003

4. NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2021 Emergency Department Summary Tables. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2023.

5. Lin Z, Cardelli P, Marino R, Lim SH, Di Somma S, Great Network. Advantage of Using of High-Sensitivity Troponin I Compared to Conventional Troponin I in Shortening Time to Rule out/in Acute Coronary Syndrome in Chest Pain Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022;58(10). doi:10.3390/medicina58101391

6. Danese E, Montagnana M. An historical approach to the diagnostic biomarkers of acute coronary syndrome. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(10):194. doi:10.21037/atm.2016.05.19

7. Tilea I, Varga A, Serban RC. Past, Present, and Future of Blood Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction-Promises and Challenges. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(5). doi:10.3390/diagnostics11050881

8. Pines JM, Pollack CV, Diercks DB, Chang AM, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. The association between emergency department crowding and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(7):617-625. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00456.x

9. Herlitz J, Wireklintsundström B, Bång A, Berglund A, Svensson L, Blomstrand C. Early identification and delay to treatment in myocardial infarction and stroke: differences and similarities. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010;18:48. doi:10.1186/1757-7241-18-48

10. Kurapati R, Soos MP. CPK-MB. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2024

11. Hajar R. Evolution of myocardial infarction and its biomarkers: A historical perspective. Heart Views. 2016;17(4):167-172. doi:10.4103/1995-705X.201786

12. Babuin L, Jaffe AS. Troponin: the biomarker of choice for the detection of cardiac injury. CMAJ. 2005;173(10):1191-1202. doi:10.1503/cmaj/051291

13. Katrukha IA. Human cardiac troponin complex. Structure and functions. Biochemistry Mosc. 2013;78(13):1447-1465. doi:10.1134/S0006297913130063

14. Januzzi JL. IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW TROPONIN TESTS AIDS DIAGNOSIS OF MI. Advances in Motion | Massachusetts General Hospital. Published online June 5, 2018. Accessed May 14, 2024. https://advances.massgeneral.org/cardiovascular/article.aspx?id=1040

15. Collinson P, Hammerer-Lercher A, Aakre K, et al. Implementation of high sensitivity troponin into routine clinical practice - results of the extended CARdiac MArkers guideline uptake in Europe group (CARMAGUE) survey. Clin Chim Acta. 2024;558:117900. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2024.117900

16. Tiwari D, Aw TC. Optimizing the Clinical Use of High-Sensitivity Troponin Assays: A Review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;14(1). doi:10.3390/diagnostics14010087

17. Wenger NK. Women and coronary heart disease: a century after Herrick: understudied, underdiagnosed, and undertreated. Circulation. 2012;126(5):604-611. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.086892

18. Arora S, Stouffer GA, Kucharska-Newton AM, et al. Twenty year trends and sex differences in young adults hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2019;139(8):1047-1056. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037137

19. Joseph NM, Ramamoorthy L, Satheesh S. Atypical Manifestations of Women Presenting with Myocardial Infarction at Tertiary Health Care Center: An Analytical Study. J Midlife Health. 2021;12(3):219-224. doi:10.4103/jmh.JMH_20_20

20. Chapagain Koirala P, Sah RK, Sherpa K, Poudyal S, Gautam B, Koirala R. Acute myocardial infarction in women, a study on risk factors, angiographic features and outcomes. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2024;21(3):491-497. doi:10.33314/jnhrc.v21i3.4762

21. Xu Y, Harris K, Pouncey AL, et al. Sex differences in risk factors for incident peripheral artery disease hospitalisation or death: Cohort study of UK Biobank participants. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(10):e0292083. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0292083

22. Romiti GF, Cangemi R, Toriello F, et al. Sex-Specific Cut-Offs for High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin: Is Less More? Cardiovasc Ther. 2019;2019:9546931. doi:10.1155/2019/9546931

23. Everett BM, Brooks MM, Vlachos HEA, et al. Sex Differences in Cardiac Troponin and the Risk of Death or Major Cardiovascular Events. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(9):978-980. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.013

24. Lee KK, Ferry AV, Anand A, et al. Sex-Specific Thresholds of High-Sensitivity Troponin in Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(16):2032-2043. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.082

25. Solola Nussbaum S, Henry S, Yong CM, Daugherty SL, Mehran R, Poppas A. Sex-Specific Considerations in the Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management of Ischemic Heart Disease: JACC Focus Seminar 2/7. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(14):1398-1406. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.065

26. Apple FS, Ler R, Murakami MM. Determination of 19 cardiac troponin I and T assay 99th percentile values from a common presumably healthy population. Clin Chem. 2012;58(11):1574-1581. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2012.192716

27. NHLBI, NIH. Working to increase awareness of heart disease in women. NHLBI, NIH. February 14, 2024. Accessed May 22, 2024. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/news/2024/working-increase-awareness-heart-disease-women

28. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Federal Register :: Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) Proficiency Testing Regulations Related to Analytes and Acceptable Performance. Federal Register. July 11, 2022. Accessed May 10, 2024. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/07/11/2022-14513/clinical-laboratory-improvement-amendments-of-1988-clia-proficiency-testing-regulations-related-to

29. ACHC. CMS Changing CLIA Proficiency Testing Regulations. Accreditation Commission for Health Care. July 19, 2023. Accessed May 10, 2024. https://www.achc.org/cms-changing-clia-testing/

30. Miller JA. Get Ready for Proficiency Testing Changes. Clinical Laboratory News. May 1, 2024. Accessed June 7, 2024. https://www.myadlm.org/cln/articles/2024/mayjune/get-ready-for-proficiency-testing-changes

Dr. Lindsay Sun, M.D., M.S.
Dr. Lindsay Sun, M.D., M.S.
Dr. Sun joined Beckman Coulter in 2009 and has focused on bringing clinical insights into product development for Immunoassay projects, currently working on biomarkers in heart failure, blood virus, and Reproductive Endocrinology. Her expertise in statistics and knowledge of medical needs ensure the quality of research study design and analysis.

Related Articles

Exploring the Potential Role of Blood-Based Biomarkers in Identifying and Monitoring Alzheimer's Disease

Exploring the Potential Role of Blood-Based Biomarkers in Identifying and Monitoring Alzheimer's Disease

At the 2024 Clinical Trials in Alzheimer’s Disease (CTAD 2024) conference in Madrid, Spain, discussed the promise of blood-based diagnostic biomarkers.
A New Powerful Web Search Experience

A New Powerful Web Search Experience

Beckman Coulter is thrilled to introduce a revolutionary new web search experience, empowering you to find information faster, making your searches more productive than ever before.
Bacterial Resistance: Actions from the Core Microbiology Lab

Bacterial Resistance: Actions from the Core Microbiology Lab

Learn from our MicroTeam some “MicroTips” about the critical role of the microbiology laboratory for patients, reporting, and the larger impact to antimicrobial stewardship.